Friday, July 31, 2009

The PED-List

And another two bite the dust.

When Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz – who made up one of the most dangerous 1-2 punches in the game earlier this decade when they played for Boston – were mentioned Thursday as being on the list of 104 players to test positive for performance-enhancing drugs in 2003, it sent shockwaves throughout Red Sox Nation.

Fans were shocked that Ortiz, who always seemed to come up with the clutch hit when it counted, would be among those who took steroids. Sure, his numbers have dipped the past two years, but a nagging wrist injury was always the alibi.

I, for one, am not surprised by any revelations when it comes to steroids in baseball these days. It’s simply unfathomable to think anyone is clean during this dark age, and that includes Albert Puljos, who vehemently denies any link.

Why should we believe him? He’s by far the best hitter in the game, and stroking home runs out of the park and partying like it’s 1999. Still, that’s not my concern.

My biggest concern is this list. Many players and managers in baseball, most of whom are sick and tired of this trickling effect, the dropping of one and two names at a time, sounded off on Thursday, urging the powers that be in the MLB to reveal the remaining names and move on.

Former Sox shortstop Nomar Garciaparra went as far as to say that some players asked to be put down as positive because they were in favor of steroid testing in baseball. “The whole thing was, if there’s five percent (testing positive) or more, we’re going to have steroid testing. If it’s under five percent, there won’t be testing, and a lot of guys were like, ‘Yeah, we want to have testing.’”

MLB baseball refutes Nomar’s claim, saying players weren’t allowed to put their names down as positive to build support for testing, and that all players were forced to submit a urine sample.

Either way, this list is starting to grow both tired and old. For players like Ortiz, who said Thursday’s report from the New York Times “blindsided him,” it sullies his accomplishments on the field. And writers, who vote for induction into the Hall of Fame, no longer know what to think.

Ramirez, when asked by reporters about the allegations, said, "Talk to the union," and he's right. His union is letting him down. This list was supposed to be confidential. Who is leaking this information, and why isn't the union doing anything about?

These days, I enojoy baseball for what it's worth - nothing more than entertainment. I no longer put stock in records or numbers, only because they've been so skewed in the past 10 years that it's hard to differentiate between eras.

Baseball is broken, and it'll take some hard work to get it fixed. And truth be told, it might be beyond repair.

11 comments:

Cheryl said...

Baseball is never beyond repair. There have been scandals aplenty over the years. This is just this century's version of it. I watch baseball because I love watching baseball. The talented (whether enhanced or not) players making highlight reel plays, home runs that haven't landed yet, the managers and coaches strategizing as the game flows through the innings, the thrill of your team still playing in October or the heartbreak when once again your team goes home in September. I love baseball movies and all manner of non-statistical baseball stuff. I don't believe 104 players named on a list from 6 years ago is condemning MLB to a slow painful death. Too many people care too much. And even though Mr. Selig saved my Brewers and was key to us Wisconsinites having an awesome ballpark, he needs to pull his head out of his, um, the sand and start addressing all of this stuff. And then working to DO something about it. I agree that this 1-2 names here and there is BS. Get it all out in the open and deal with it.

Scott Barrett said...

Cheryl, I couldn't agree more that watching games to see highlight-reel defensive plays, no-hitters and perfect games is well worth my three hours. I love October baseball, as well.

The only point that I was making is that I will not give one more ounce of energy to another home run chase, or if someone is trying for the triple crown. To me, individual numbers no longer mean anything, and the only numbers that should count are wins and losses.

Cheryl said...

I agree Scott. I never much cared about the stats anyway since the Sammy Sosa/Mark McGwire home run sham. Oh and of course some twit named Bonds. Players come and go. How many players are even on the same team from year to year and I'm tired of trying to figure out where they went and what they're doing. It doesn't matter. Unless you're a Robin Yount, Cal Ripken or George Brett, I don't really care. I don't even have a favorite player anymore (Geoff Jenkins, Rob Deer, Gorman Thomas along with the above three)

I only commented that I disagreed with your statement "And truth be told, it might be beyond repair." Baseball right now may put the "fun" in dysfunctional but it'll be ok.

Anonymous said...

The one constant through all the years, Ray, has been baseball. America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It has been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt and erased again. But baseball has marked the time. This field, this game: it's a part of our past, Ray. It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again. Oh... people will come Ray. People will most definitely come.

Anonymous said...

oh please....stop the dramatics...people continue to go to the ball parks and watch on TV and the MONEY continues to pour in

Scott Barrett said...

If only it could be like that again. When the only supplements players were taking were alcohol and tobacco, and they still hit the ball a country mile. The biggest scandal in the games were throwing a World Series.

Times have changed, Ray. And Terrance Mann would agree.

Anonymous said...

I laugh at all the "steroid outrage"...it happens everytime a player is caught, the media goes crazy for about 2 weeks then things calm down and it's business as usual.......just watch, in 3 weeks all the talk will be about the pennant race and it will be like..."huh?...what?....oh yeah Ortiz did roids..whatever....who's pitching tonight?".....The American puplic has the attention span of a fruit fly

Cheryl said...

Times have changed indeed. But that's another great part about baseball. Whether it's sitting in a major league park with 40,000 other fans or watching the little kids play T-ball at the local Legion park, the outside world can stop for awhile if you let it. If you get into the game at all, the rest of the world and it's trials and tribulations go on without you. So yes, things have changed but the spirit of the game hasn't.

And for Mr. Cynical Anonymous, yes, the American public has the attention span of a gnat. That's not the point. It's cheating. And whether we as fans even think about it in two weeks or not doesn't make it ok. And yes, you bring up another reason why baseball is so cool. We will forget about it in a couple weeks and we will be caught up in the pennant races, who's picking up steam and who's doing their annual second half fade. That was my point. It's not so much steroid outrage as unfair advantage. At least until the player gets older and weird things happen to his body.

Scott Barrett said...

It is cheating, but cheating has been around since the 1900s, when Newport's Frank Coridone invented the spitball. Then there was Gaylord Perry and puttin all sorts of stuff on the ball to get more movement on his knuckleball.

How about when MLB started winding the balls tighter to get more distance on home runs? Or even at the swim championships, when new suits have made for 27 new world records in the matter of five days? No, that's not a misprint.

This is why comparing eras in any sports is just not fun. Like I said in my original post, just accept sports for what they're worth.

I agree with anonymous that people won't care once the pennant races start heating up. Sure, Yankees fans will still be giving Ortiz flack, just like Sox fans continue to call him A-Roid.

Just the way of the world.

Anonymous said...

well Cheryl, my point is that it's hypocritical to have it both ways. I'm talking about the people who pound their fists in outrage and shout how corrupt the game is but then 2 seconds later they are like, "so who's pitching for the Sox tonight!!!"......something about that doesn't seem right

Cheryl said...

I don't think it's hypocritical at all. It's simply seeing both sides of an issue. Yes, I think PED are cheating. Am I going to give up on baseball because of it? No. Two separate issues. It is like everything in life. If it's something or someone you care about you take the good with the bad. And keep both in perspective. I like to garden but the bugs drive me nuts. Do I give up the pleasure of seeing things grow for a few annoying critters? Not so much. Same thing. It's not that black/white. Do we condemn all of baseball for a few annoying critters? Expand your mind Anonymous, you might discover a new way of looking at life and all that's in it.
And if not, well then good luck to ya.