Friday, June 4, 2010

Game 1 musings

After last night's 102-89 loss to the Lakers in Game 1 of the NBA finals, Celtics coach Doc Rivers was asked if there was a silver lining to the defeat.

The answer is yes, because Boston can only play better.

This was a disaster from the start. The Celtics gave up too many offensive rebounds, and they lost 17 of 21 in the 50-50 game. That just means that the Lakers, who deserve tons of credit for the way they played, were more intense.

And that showed from the start. Pau Gasol proved he's going to be a handful throughout this series. He hit shots from the outside. He made putbacks. He hit little scoops en route to a 23-point, 14-rebound performance.

Too many Lakers, especially Kobe Bryant, but Shannon Brown and Jordan Farmar, got to the rim too easily. And even when they missed the shots, L.A. was there to get the offensive rebound, because the driving player pulled the forward out of place.

Offensively, Ray Allen never got into a rhythm, Kevin Garnett was awful with the exception of a small stretch and Rajon Rondo was contained. Paul Pierce, who scored a team-high 24 points, was the only bright spot.

Just a disaster, and history says this doesn't bode well for the C's. Phil Jackson's teams are 47-0 when they win the first game of a series. But again, the silver lining is that Boston was within striking distance despite playing horribly.

To me, a split in Los Angeles is mandatory. Game 2 now becomes Game 7. Because even though the series shifts back to Boston for Games 3-5, the Celtics won't sweep at home. For banner No. 18 to be hung in the rafters, more intensity is needed.

And I hope the Celtics remember that final 3-pointer from Bryant. It came with just seconds to go, with the game clearly out of reach, and it put the Lakers over the 100-point mark. It was a slap in the face.

2 comments:

Josh Krueger said...

Some more musings from a slightly different point of view:

Every time an opposing player touches Paul Pierce, he acts like he got shot. He's almost as bad as a soccer player at this point. That foul that was called on Kobe early in Game 1 was a perfect example. At best, it was a ticky-tack foul that shouldn't be called in the NBA finals. But Pierce went flying like "Stone Cold" Steve Austin had just thrown him across the ring.

Despite your rooting interest in this series, you have to be impressed with the way the Lakers played. They out-muscled what I thought was the toughest team in the NBA. They played better defense than what I thought was the best defensive team in the NBA. And in doing so, they didn't sacrifice any part of their offense. If I were a Celtics fan, I'd be seriously worried after what I saw Thursday night.

Kobe's late 3 was a slap in the face, eh? Funny. When the New England Patriots continue to smack around teams late in blowouts, the response around here is, "You don't like it? Stop them."
Well, if you don't like Kobe hitting a middle-finger 3 at the end of the game, do something about it.

Obviously, this is the NBA, so anything can happen. Game 1's blowout victim can easily be Game 2's blowout victor. Scott's absolutely right that the C's need to win Game 2. If they don't, a sweep is a very real possibility. Not likely, but possible.

Scott Barrett said...

It's funny how you picked Paul Pierce to make your point. Everyone does it. Watch Gasol. Watch Kobe.

Unfortunately, it's become a part of the game, and I think refs need to separate what is actually a foul, and what is a guy looking to get to the line.

There were 55 fouls called in Game 1, and too many guys were in foul trouble - Ray Allen, especially. I understand the stars are going to get star calls, but it really messes with the flow of the game.

And more importantly, on the rare occasion that these calls aren't made, every player makes a stink about it. The NBA officials have set a bad, bad precedent.